
Profits, Taxes, Kickbacks… and Bleeding Hearts
Let the Double Standar Begin!
California is not taxing the sun itself – which would be patently ubsurd – but rather proposing changes to how solar energy systems are treated for taxing the billing on energy produced as INCOME and property taxes. This has been dubbed a “solar tax” by some – which it is a TAX. Specifically, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is considering proposals that would reduce the credits solar panel owners receive for the excess energy they send back to the grid and potentially add a monthly grid participation charge. Additionally, a solar property tax exclusion is set to expire, which could lead to increased property taxes for some solar owners.
- California has a net metering program that allows solar panel owners to receive credits on their electricity bills for the excess energy their systems send back to the grid.
- Utilities like PG&E, Edison, and SDG&E have proposed changes to net metering that would reduce these credits, effectively increasing the cost of solar for some consumers.
- The CPUC is considering a proposal to add a monthly grid participation charge, which would further impact solar customers.
- Currently, California has a property tax exclusion for solar energy systems, meaning that the increased value of a home due to solar panels is not factored into property tax assessments.
- This exclusion is set to expire on January 1, 2027, meaning that after that date, solar panel installations could lead to increased property taxes.
- There is ongoing discussion about whether to extend or modify this exclusion, according to the Solar Rights Alliance.
- These proposed changes have sparked controversy, with some arguing that they will discourage solar adoption and harm the environment.
- Organizations like the Solar Rights Alliance have been vocal in their opposition to the proposed changes, calling them a “solar tax” and arguing that they violate the state’s commitment to clean energy.
- There have been attempts to defeat the proposed changes in the past, and public outcry has played a role in shaping the discussion.